Yes, we *can* print as much as we need. We don’t need to starve the poor and the elderly, we don’t have to let the bridges fall down, we don’t need *any* level of unemployment. These are all political choices intended to promote inequality and create a powerful, unaccountable aristocracy:
â€œThe United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default.â€ Alan Greenspan
â€œIn the case of United States, default is absolutely impossible. All U.S. government debt is denominated in U.S. dollar assets.â€ Peter Zeihan, Vice President of Analysis for STRATFOR
â€œIn the case of governments boasting monetary sovereignty and debt denominated in its own currency, like the United States (but also Japan and the UK), it is technically impossible to fall into debt default.â€ Erwan Mahe, European asset allocation and options strategies adviser
â€œThere is never a risk of default for a sovereign nation that issues its own free-floating currency and where its debts are denominated in that currency.â€ Mike Norman, Chief Economist for John Thomas Financial
â€œThere is no inherent limit on federal expenses and therefore on federal spendingâ€¦When the U.S. government decides to spend fiat money, it adds to its banking reserve system and when it taxes or borrows (issues Treasury securities) it drains reserves from its banking system. These reserve operations are done solely to maintain the target Federal Funds rate.â€ Monty Agarwal , managing partner and chief investment officer of MA Managed Futures Fund
â€œAs the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.â€ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
â€œGovernment needs to be concerned about pressures on inflation and the exchange rate should its spending become excessive. And it should avoid â€œcrowding outâ€ private initiative by moving too many resources to our public sector. However, with high unemployment and idle plant and equipment, no one can reasonably argue that these dangers are imminent.â€ L. Randall Wray
Taxes arenâ€™t about getting money to spend, they are about regulating our spending power to make sure we donâ€™t have too much and cause inflation, or too little which causes unemployment and recessions. — Warren Mosler
â€œA sovereign government can always make payments as they come due by crediting bank accounts â€” something recognized by Chairman Ben Bernanke when he said the Fed spends by marking up the size of the reserve accounts of banks.â€ L. Randall Wray, Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and a Senior Scholar at the Levy Economics Institute.
SCOTT PELLEY: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending?
CHAIRMAN BERNANKE: Itâ€™s not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed, much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So, to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed.
RYAN: “Do you believe that personal retirement accounts can help us achieve solvency for the system and make those future retiree benefits more secure?”
GREENSPAN: “Well, I wouldn’t say that the pay-as-you-go benefits are insecure, in the sense that there’s nothing to prevent the federal government from creating as much money as it wants and paying it to somebody. The question is, how do you set up a system which assures that the real assets are created which those benefits are employed to purchase.”
And obviously a full-employment policy can take care of that little item.